Thanks for the responses Jack. To answer your first sentence in the last reply, yes I am asking if I can eliminate the WDH.
I did a little research based on your comment. Well, I used ChatGPT. It's reporting that no state requires WDHs. It went on to explain that some vehicle manuals may require it using the following example:
For instance, the 2018 Chevy Traverse owner's manual states that weight distribution and sway control are required when towing a trailer over 5,000 lbs.
In the case of the 2206T, it came in at 3850lbs loaded, no water in the tanks. I believe with the tanks full it adds another 750lbs.
To your point about the increased tongue weight without the wdh. I cannot speak to this as I did not measure it. It's something I should and will do next time I have the trailer hitched.
I asked ChatGPT for the benefits of a WDH:
A WDH helps distribute the tongue weight of the trailer more evenly across the axles of the tow vehicle. This reduces the strain on the rear axle and helps balance the weight, preventing rear-end sag and improving stability.
In my case I was running the trailer with a TPS. The tire pressures stated +/- 1.5 PSI front to rear with wider variations left and right due to uneven heating from the sun. It's certainly not a definitive measure of axle weight, but it is an indication of load distribution, IMO.
Sway, or fishtailing, is a common issue when towing. A WDH reduces sway by maintaining a more even load distribution, making it less likely for crosswinds, passing vehicles, or sudden steering changes to destabilize the trailer.
This even distribution enhances steering control and braking, especially during turns or emergency stops.
I can't argue with this. The WDH does provide more stability depending on situations. I did have one close call during the trip where I had to brake hard to due to a semi locking up his brakes to stop in traffic with no working trailer lights. In that case the trailer stayed in line with the truck with no noticeable sway or loss of control.
By leveling the load, a WDH reduces strain on the rear suspension of the towing vehicle, decreasing the chances of premature wear and tear on suspension components.
Something else I can't argue and which you stated as well.
A WDH provides a smoother, more comfortable ride by preventing the “see-saw” effect where the front end of the tow vehicle is raised, and the rear end sags. This balance minimizes jostling and bouncing, resulting in a more stable, comfortable towing experience.
I can't say I noticed a difference. I'm considering adding airbags.
With a WDH, the tow vehicle sits more level, preventing the front from lifting. This improves driver visibility and ensures that headlights are correctly aimed, enhancing nighttime driving safety.
The rear did sag more without the WDH.
A more balanced load can reduce drag by keeping the vehicle and trailer level, which may improve fuel economy compared to a non-WDH setup.
If this is true, it's marginal. 13.9 MPG is the best I've gotten out of it. I noticed slightly higher MPG at higher altitudes. When I left Texas my MPG dropped from 14 MPG to 13.9 MPG.
I also looked up the disadvantages of a WDH, but they're not worth mentioning as the benefits outweigh the disadvantages.
The next long trip I take, I'll use it. But for short weekend trips, I think I'll leave it at home.
